2026:HHC:24764 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 7408 of 2026 Date of decision: 24.06.2026 _____________________________________________________________________________ Deepanjali ...Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. …Respondents. ____________________________________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 _____________________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. None. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. J.S. Guleria, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 to 4. Mr. Surinder Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 5. __________________________________________________________ Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge Despite repeated call during pre-lunch and post-lunch sessions, no one has come forward to represent the petitioner. 2. Yesterday also, despite repeated calls during pre-lunch and post-lunch sessions, no one had put in appearance on behalf of the 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:24764 CWP No. 7408 of 2026 petitioner. However, in the interest of justice, instead of passing any adverse order, matter was adjourned for today. 3. Today again, fact remains the same that no one is coming forward to represent the petitioner. Therefore, petition is dismissed in default as well as for want of prosecution. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Vivek Singh Thakur), Judge. (Ranjan Sharma), 24th June, 2026 Judge. (susheel)