Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13227 (AP)

Smt. Makireddy Satyavathi v. Sri. Suresh Kumar (IAS)

CC/2683/2026 · 2026-10-06

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010339692026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] WEDNESDAY, THE 7th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2683/2026 Between: 1. SMT. MAKIREDDY SATYAVATHI, , W/O. LATE DALINAIDU, AGED 64 YEARS, R/AT RAMANNAPALEM VILLAGE, MAKAVARAPALEM MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT OF ANDHRA PRADESH-531113. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI SURESH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ SS RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE - 522503. 2. SRI DR A VISHNU VARDHAN, DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HANUMANPET, VIJAWADA-520003. 3. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE - 522503. 4. SMT B PREMAKUMARI, DIRECTOR WORKS PAY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICE, AUTONAGAR, MANGALAGIRI-522503, GUNTUR DISTRICT OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. SRI GAUTHAM ALLADA LA AND AS, THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (CEO), APCFSS, AUTONAGAR, MANGALAGIRI-522503, GUNTUR DISTRICT OF ANDHRA PRADESH. I. 6. SMT VIJAYA KRISHNAN I A S, THE DISTSRICT COLLECTOR, ANAKAPALLI, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-532201. 2 7. SRI V V RAMANA, THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NARISIPATNAM, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH- 532201. 8. SRI B VENKATARAMANA, TAHSILDAR, MAKAVARAPALEM MANDAL, MAKAVARAPALEM, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-531113. 9. SRI G PRABHAKAR RAO, THE DISTRICT HORTICULTURE OFFICER, ANAKAPALLI, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-531001. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to summon the Respondents herein and punish them under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for willfully violating the order of this Court in W.P. No. 15692 of 2024 dated 01.09.2025 passed by Honourable Justice Sri Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao Garu Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SIMHACHALAM KARUKOLA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. MANNAM VENKATA KRISHNA RAO 3. K M KRISHNA REDDY 4. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI 5. 6. BH RAMA KRISHNA NAIK 7. T LAKSHMI PADMAJA The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.2683 of 2026 ORDER: Both the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents, in unison, represented and stated that the orders of this Court have been duly complied with by the respondents. Recording the said submission, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, interlocutory applications, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 07.10.2026 KBN 4 16 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Contempt Case No.2683 of 2026 07.10.2026 KKBBNN