Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13216 (ALL)

MONU PASI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

CRLP/19887/2026 · 2026-10-04

Ajay Bhanot, Divesh Chandra Samant

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 19887 of 2026 Court No. - 49 HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J. HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J. After some arguments, Sri Manoj Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not wish to press the relief for quashing of the FIR in the writ petition. Learned AGA has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. The relief for quashing of the FIR is accordingly declined. Learned counsel for the petitioner recast his relief and pray that the petitioner may be granted leave to approach the competent court for anticipatory bail and for seeking appropriate remedies available with him under law. The writ petition is dispose of with the observation that it is always open to the petitioner to avail other legal remedies as may be advised. October 5, 2026 I.A.Siddiqui Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : Abhijeet Mukherji, Akhilendra Kumar Yadav, G.A. (Divesh Chandra Samant,J.) (Ajay Bhanot,J.) Monu Pasi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- IMRAN AHMAD SIDDIQUI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad