Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13210 (JHR)

SUDESH KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./2515/2026 · 2026-05-13

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:14604] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2515 of 2026 1. Sudesh Kumar aged about 20 years, son of Govardhan Yadav. 2. Pandu Yadav aged about 40 years, son of late Kartik Yadav. 3. Vikram Yadav @ Vikram Kumar aged about 21 years, son of Ghanu Yadav. 4. Ugan Gope @ Ugan Yadav @Ghanu Yadav aged about 50 years, son of Budhan Yadav. 5. Prem Kumar @Prem Yadav aged about 23 years, son of Ugan Gope @ Ugan Yadav. 6. Ganesh Kumar aged about 23 years, son of Govardhan Yadav. 7. Govardhan Yadav aged about 44 years, son of Late Kartik Yadav All Resident of Village- Pundaul, P.O. & P.S.- Barkagaon, Dist.- Hazaribag. ..... … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Victim ..... … Opposite Parties -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Shailendra Jit, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, A.P.P. ------ 05/ 13.05.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Barkagaon P.S. Case No.95 of 2025, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 324(4), 74 and 303(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the Court of learned J.M. 1st Class, Hazaribag. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that due to land dispute altercation took place and free fight has occurred between both the sides. He further submits that there are case and [2026:JHHC:14604] -2- counter case between the parties and there are general and omnibus allegation of assault. He then submits that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.18 of the petition. He further submits that in the similar circumstance, five other co-accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No. 2194 of 2026 by this court. 4. Learned A.P.P appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the allegation is there against these petitioners. 5. Considering that the entire family members have been made accused and further the altercation took place due to land dispute and there are case and counter case between the parties and the injury is said to be simple and the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.18 of the petition and further in the similar circumstance, five other co-accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail in the aforementioned A.B.A., I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the petitioners, above named, are hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of their surrender/arrest, the petitioners, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Hazaribag in connection with Barkagaon P.S. Case No.95 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-13.05.2026 Amitesh/-