( 2026:HHC:10520 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Contempt Petition No.214 of 2026 Date of decision: 07.04.2026 Rajneesh Kumar ….Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & Another ….Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Harish Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Mr. Manoj Chauhan and Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocates General with Mr.Ankush Thakur, Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu and Ms. Archna Negi, Deputy Advocates General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge(Oral): Issue notice. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents/State. He has placed on record Office Order dated 06.04.2026, wherein, it has been stated that judgment passed by this Court in CWP No.20882 of 2025, stands duly complied with in its letter and spirit. 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2 ( 2026:HHC:10520 ) 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, acknowledges the aforesaid fact of compliance of the said judgment, passed by this Court. 3. Therefore, in view of the above, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge April 07, 2026 (reena)