PRATIMA BHATTACHARJEE ALIAS PRATIMA ROY CHOUDHURY v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
WP(C)/2365/2026 · 2026-08-23
Manish Choudhury
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13206 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13206 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010086102026
2026:GAU-AS:12061
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2365/2026 PRATIMA BHATTACHARJEE ALIAS PRATIMA ROY CHOUDHURY W/O- AJAY ROY CHOUDHURY, R/O- VILL.- SHAYAMANANDA LANE NO. 10, KANAKPUR-II, P.O. KANAKPUR-II, DIST. CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN- 788005. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, DIST. KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM, PIN- 781006.
2:INSPECTOR OF POLICE CYBERCRIME POLICE STATION THENI DISTRICT TAMILNADU.
3:AJIT SINGH SI CYBERCRIME POLICE STATION ROHINI DISTRICT DELHI. VIDE NOTICE U/S 94 BNSS 2023 DATED- 07-10-2025.
4:THE SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CACHAR DISTRICT SILCHAR ASSAM PIN- 788001.
5:THE BRANCH MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA NEW SILCHAR BRANCH HAILAKANDI ROAD
Page No.# 2/2 NETAJI SUBASH AVENUE RANGIRKHARI SILCHAR-788005 DIST. CACHAR ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S DAS, MRS. A DAS,E KHANDAKAR Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER 24.08.2026
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner today on call. When the writ petition was listed previously on 29.05.2026 and 12.06.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on those two occasions also. In the Order dated 12.06.2026, it was observed that if on the next date of listing, the petitioner would remain unrepresented, appropriate orders would be passed. Mr. S.S. Roy, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent nos. 1 & 4 is present. In view of non-representation on behalf of the petitioner for three consecutive occasions on 29.05.2026, 12.06.2026 and 24.08.2026, this Court is persuaded to take a view that the petitioner is no longer interested to pursue this writ petition and therefore, the writ petition is dismissed due to non-prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant