Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010172672026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2839/2026 SANAM BEGUM DAUGHTER OF LATE SOLEMAN ALI A RESIDENT OF VILL-KHENA ALIBARI UNDER PALASHBARI REVENUE CIRCLE, DISTRICT-KAMRUP, ASSAM PIN-781131. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR,GUWAHATI- 781006 2:DISTRICT COMMISSIONER KAMRUP AMINGAON PIN-781031 3:CO- DISTRICT COMMISSIONER OFFICE OF THE CO DISTRICT COMMISSIONER PALASHBARI CO - DISTRICT MIRZA KAMRUP ASSAM PIN-781125 4:THE CIRCLE OFFICER PALASHBARI REVENUE CIRCLE MIRZA PIN-781125 5:SRI BALENDRA CHANDRA THAKURIA SON OF LATE BANGSHIDHAR THAKURIA A RESIDENT OF VILL DHARAPUR KHANAMUKH Page No.# 2/3 P.O. DHARAPUR P.S.- AZARA GUWAHATI ASSAM PIN-78101 Linked Case : WP(C)/3952/2026 SANAM BEGUM DAUGHTER OF LATE SOLEMAN ALI A RESIDENT OF VILL-KHENA ALIBARI UNDER PALASHBARI REVENUE CIRCLE DISTRICT-KAMRUP ASSAM PIN-781131. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHERS REPRESENTED BY THECOMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TOTHE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM REVENUE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006. 2:DISTRICT COMMISSIONER KAMRUP AMINGAONPIN-781031 3:CO DISTRICT COMMISSIONER OFFICE OF THE CO-DISTRICTCOMMISSIONER PALASHBARI O -DISTRICT MIRZA KAMRUP ASSAM PIN-781125 4:THE CIRCLE OFFICER PALASHBARI REVENUE CIRCLEMIRZA PIN-781125 For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. T. K. Bhuyan, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. H. Sarmah, Addl. Sr. Govt. Advocate, Ms. G. Hazarika, SC, Revenue Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH O R D E R 26.08.2026 This is an application filed for impleading the Opposite Party No.5 as the Respondent No.5 in the accompanying writ petition. It is relevant to take note of that the Opposite Party No.5 is admittedly the landowner wherein the Petitioner/the Applicant is residing. 2. In the opinion of this Court, the instant application is misconceived in as much as the Opposite Party No.5 cannot be impleaded as the Respondent in the accompanying writ petition. At best, the Opposite Party No.5 can file a separate application seeking impleadment as a co-Petitioner. 3. Accordingly, the instant application stands rejected as being misconceived. JUDGE Comparing Assistant