Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13198 (BOM)

Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Limited v. Radhika Enterprises

ARBP/48/2025 · 2026-10-01

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

40-ARBP-48-2025.doc Gayatri IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 48 OF 2025 WITH ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. (L) NO. 25071 OF 2026 (NOB) Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Limited … Petitioner V/s. Radhika Enterprises … Respondent Mr. Zerick Dastur a/w Mr. Khushk Shah & Mr. Jennifer S. i/b Khushil Shah, for Petitioner. Mr. Arjun, for Respondent. CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : OCTOBER 1, 2026 P.C.: 1. The Respondents have filed an undertaking setting out the schedule of repayment. The undertaking is accepted. 2. The Petition stands disposed of in terms of the undertaking. 3. It is stated on behalf of the Petitioner that in view of the filing of the undertaking, the Petitioner shall not impose any penal charges upon the Respondent. 1 GAYATRI RAJENDRA SHIMPI Digitally signed by GAYATRI RAJENDRA SHIMPI Date: 2026.10.01 17:52:12 +0530 40-ARBP-48-2025.doc ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO. 25071 OF 2026 4. Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on board. 5. In view of the undertaking filed by Respondent in Section 9 proceedings, nothing remains to be adjudicated in this Petition. Hence, the Petition is therefore disposed of as infructuous. (AMIT BORKAR, J.) 2