. ( 2026:HHC:24832 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Contempt Petition No.743 of 2026 Date of decision: 25.06.2026 Ankush Lata ….Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & another ….Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Vikrant, Advocate vice Mr. Rocky, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge(Oral): Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on record communication dated 20.06.2026 along with copy of office order dated 08.06.2026, wherein, it has been stated that the representation of the petitioner has been considered and decided by the respondent-Department vide Office Order dated 8th June, 2026. 2. Therefore, in view of the above, as the judgment under reference has been duly complied with, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2 . ( 2026:HHC:24832 ) is closed and disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to assail the aforesaid office order dated 08.06.2026, if she still remains aggrieved. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge June 25, 2026 (reena)