Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13193 (ALL)

VIPIN KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P., THROUGH ITS HOME SECRETARY U.P.

BAIL/33315/2026 · 2026-10-04

Krishan Pahal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33315 of 2026 Court No. - 68 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Atul Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Abhishek Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 154 of 2026 Under Section 95, 143(3), 143(4), 146, 127(4), 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 109(1) BNS; Sections 3/14 of the Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act; Sections 75/79 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act; and Sections 16/17/18 of the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, Police Station Titavi District Muzaffar Nagar, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant has nothing to do with the said offence. The applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The case under the Labour Act has been converted into F.I.R. by the informant as an afterthought. The name of the applicant has come up subsequently in the statement of the labours. The criminal history stands explained and is in jail since 19.08.2026. He undertakes to cooperate with the trial and not misuse the liberty of bail. 6. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application but the submissions raised by the learned counsel for the applicant could not be Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Atul Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vipin Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P., Through Its Home Secretary U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) disputed. 7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima-facie the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant- Vipin Kumar, be released on bail in the aforementioned case crime on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required. 9. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. October 5, 2026 Ashok Gupta BAIL No. 33315 of 2026 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad