Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13190 (CHH)

AMIT KUMAR CHOPRA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1927/2023 · 2026-02-04

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:6500-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1927 of 2023 1 - Amit Kumar Chopra S/o Late Gautam Chand Chopra, Aged About 51 Years R/o Itwari Bazaar, Khairagarh, District Kcg Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, Capital Complex, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Police Station Daundi Lohara, District Balod Chhattisgarh. 3 - Loon Karan Thakur, S/o Late Shri Manu Ram Thakur, R/o Gram Khairidih, Post Sambalpur, P.S. Daundi Lohara, District Balod, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Shri Chakresh Tiwari, Advocate. For State : Shri Priyank Rathi, Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ramesh Sinha, CJ Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 05.02.2026 Per, Ramesh Sinha, CJ. 1 The petitioner has filed this petition with the following prayer: “It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to exercise its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. and in exercise thereof call for the records, if necessary, admit the petition and after hearing parties further please to as ex debito justitiae quash the impugned FIR so far as it relates to the Petitioner and/or if arrayed during the course of the investigation, quash such action and all consequential proceedings in the facts and circumstance of the case and/or pass such other orders in INDRAJEET SAHU Digitally signed by INDRAJEET SAHU Date: 2026.02.05 16:58:37 +0530 2 favour of the petitioner as this Hon’ble Court may deem it fit in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that trial is in progress and evidence of witnesses are being recorded and therefore he may be permitted to withdraw this petition. 3 Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No order asto costs. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice inder