Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13188 (BOM)

ARIF GAFFAR MEMON AND ANR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROU. GOVT PLEADER AND ORS

WP/12613/2026 · 2026-09-30

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

901-WP12613-2026.DOC Santosh IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 12613 OF 2026 Arif Gaffar Memon And Anr ...Petitioners Versus The State Of Maharashtra Through Govt Pleader And Ors …Respondents Mr. A. N. Giri, a/w Sagar Batavia, for the Petitioners. Ms. Dharani Divekar, a/w Nishi Naval,i/b R. S. Juslicia Law Chambers, for SRA & AGRC. Mr. Ranjeev Carvalho, i/b Siddharth Sharma, for Respondent No.4. Mr. S. H. Kankal, AGP for the State – Respondent No.1. CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATED: 30th SEPTEMBER, 2026 PC:- 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners. 2. The challenge in this petition is to an order dated 11th September, 2026, whereby the AGRC has declined to grant ad- interim relief. 3. By the said order itself the AGRC has recorded that the appeal has been finally heard and closed for orders. 4. In these circumstances, since the AGRC has already heard the appeal finally and closed it for orders, till the passing of the final order and its communication to the petitioners – 1/2 SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Digitally signed by SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2026.10.01 17:37:06 +0530 901-WP12613-2026.DOC appellants, no coercive action be taken against the petitioners, pursuant to the order which is impugned in Appeal No.319/2026, which awaits verdict by the AGRC. 5. The petition stands disposed. [N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 2/2