1 2026:CGHC:1925-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 3563 of 2025 1 - Dipesh Chouksey S/o Dinesh Chouksey, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Hotel Triton Opp. Currency Tower, VIP Chowk Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Sakri, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 2 - Virendra Nagvanshi, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Kumharpara, Jarhabhata Road, Near Progressive Convent School, PS Civil Line, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate. For Respondent No.1/State : Mr. Priyank Rathi, Govt. Advocate. For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Sandeep Kumar Sharma, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 13-01-2026 1. Heard Mr. Mateen Siddiqui, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Priyank Rathi, learned Govt. Advocate Digitally signed by MOHAMMED AADIL KHAN Date: 2026.01.15 12:30:09 +0530 2 appearing for respondent No.1/State and Mr. Sandeep Kumar Sharma, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “It is, therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to allow this petition and quash the F.I.R. Dated 01.01.2024 & Charge-sheet Dated 27.08.2024 (P/1) in crime No.02/2024 for the offence under section 306 & 34 of IPC & under Section 3(2)(V) Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989at Police Station Sakti Bilaspur and further to quash the cognizance order Dated 13.09.2024 (P/2) passed by the Special Judge (Atrocities) Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh& further to quash the order Dated 24.09.2024 (P/3) of framing of charges in Special Session case (Atrocities) No. 31/2024, so far as it relates to the petitioner herein, in the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice.” 3. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition and submits that the petitioner will cooperate in the trial. 4. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 states that the complainant and his family members whose evidence is to be recorded before the 3 trial Court shall appear before the trial Court on the next date fixed. 5. In view of the submissions made by the parties, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The learned trial Court is directed to proceed with the trial of the case. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Aadil