1 / 2 2026:CGHC:5915 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1244 of 2026 • Smt. Shobha Tamboli W/o Shri Dinesh Kumar Tamboli Aged About 40 Years Posted Assistant Teacher At Government School Rainpur, Block Kota, Circle Karra, Dist. Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1. The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Dist. Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director Public Education, Indravati Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Dist. Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer Bilaspur Dist. Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer Kota, Dist. Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Mohd. Sohail Khan, Advocate For Respondent-State : Ms. Anuja Sharma, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 03/02/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs. “10.1 That, petitioner most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus and directed to resp. no. 3 to consider the representation (Annex. P-4) of the petitioner regarding consider her name in seniority list of 01.04.2025 with effect from joining date 30.06.2007. 10.2 Any other relief of reliefs that may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be granted also. “ 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that seniority of petitioner has wrongly been fixed in the gradation list, against which petitioner has submitted a PAWAN KUMAR JHA Digitally signed by PAWAN KUMAR JHA Date: 2026.02.03 18:43:25 +0530 2 / 2 representation on 23.12.2025 which till date is pending consideration and therefore direction be issued to Respondent No. 4 to consider and take decision on the pending representation of petitioner at the earliest within specific time frame. 3. Learned State counsel submits that in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner, she is having no objection. 4. On due consideration of the submission made by learned counsel for the parties, without entering into merits of case of petitioner, this writ petition at this stage is disposed of directing Respondent No. 4 to take decision on the representation of petitioner dated 23.12.2025, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a further period of 02 months from the date of receipt of copy of order passed by this Court. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observation and direction. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) pwn JUDGE