Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13183 (RAJ)

ARUN KUMAR VERMA S/O HARI SINGH VERMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/13712/2026 · 2026-08-13

Sameer Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:32401] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13712/2026 CNR: RJHC020675412026 | URN: CW / 29841U / 2026 Arun Kumar Verma S/o Hari Singh Verma, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Nhm/ns/01,bangur Hospital Campus,vd Nagar, Pali, Ra- jasthan -306401 ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 2. Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health, Govern- ment Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Ra- jasthan) 3. The Director, Medical, Health And Family-Welfare Depart- ment, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Aditi Pareek for Mr. Dharmendra Jain Ms. Monika Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rahul Verma for Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 13/08/2026 1. Learned counsel for the respective parties jointly submit that the controversy involved in the present matter can be adjudicated in light of the ratio encapsulated in the judgment passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10101/2026, titled Kamlesh Kumar Swami vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., decided on 08.07.2026. 2. In light of the aforesaid joint submission and the ratio laid down in the case of Kamlesh Kumar Swami (supra), the [2026:RJ-JP:32401] (2 of 2) [CW-13712/2026] present writ petition is hereby allowed in the same terms. The said ratio be made applicable mutatis mutandis to the present petitioner as well. 3. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J 53/Prateek