Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~86 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2147/2026 and CRL.M.A. 21486/2026, CRL.M.A. 21487/2026 SURENDER SINGH
.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Inderpal Khokhar, Mr. Pravesh Saroha, Mrs Neha, Ms Simran khokhar, Ms Dhruv khokhar, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC CRL with Mr Sangeet Sibou, Mr Aniket Kumar Singh and Mr Priyansh Raj Singh Senger, Advocates for State. CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R %
23.07.2026
1. The petitioner seeks directions to respondent nos. 2 to 4 to undertake further investigation to an independent agency with respect to FIR no. 588/24 for offence under Section 302/120B/34 the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) & 25/27 of the Arms Act registered at PS Narela, on the ground that the investigation was unfair and incomplete, pointing towards a larger conspiracy. 2. The petitioner's brother seems to have sustained gunshot injury on This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/07/2026 at 12:08:18
24.06.2024. Thereupon, an FIR registered for offence under Section 307 and 27 of the Arms Act. He succumbed to injuries on 05.07.2024. Thereafter, the offence was converted to Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). The petitioner alleges that the Investigation Officer ignored material fact indicating the involvement of few other people. 3. It appears that the investigation was carried out and the charge-sheet was submitted before the Court of competent jurisdiction. 4. The Court finds that the element of larger conspiracy or any alleged defect etc. can be looked into by the concerned Court, if the petitioner files an appropriate application before the concerned Court. 5. When the competent Court is already seized with the matter and is fully empowered in law to issue appropriate directions, there is no ground to invoke the Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 6. With the aforesaid liberty reserving in favour of the petitioner, petition, along with pending applications, stands disposed of. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J JULY 23, 2026 aks This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/07/2026 at 12:08:18