Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13180 (JHR)

SUNIL BAIDH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/3516/2026 · 2026-05-11

Sri Ananda Sen

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:14110 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 3516 of 2026 1. Sunil Baidh, Son of Damodar Baidh 2. Vikram Baidh, Son of Late Chandru Baidh 3. Prakash Thakur, S/O Tejan Thakur, All Residents of village- Parasi, P.O + P.S.-Ichak, District- Hazaribag .... Petitioner(s). Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribag, P.O. & P.S.-Sadar, District- Hazaribag. 3. The Circle Officer, Ichak, P.O. & P.S.-Ichak, District- Hazaribag. 4. Shivtahal Baidh, Son of Late Tulsi Baidh 5. Govind Baidh, Son of Late Tulsi Baidh 6. Vijay Baidh, Son of Late Tulsi Baidh 7. Sanju Baidh, Son of Late Gajo Baidh 8. Kedar Baidh, Son of Late Gauri Baidh 9. Munna Baidh, Son of Late Bhikho Baidh 10. Akalu Baidh @ DilipBaidh, Son of Late Jago Baidh 11. Manoj Baidh, Son of Sitaram Baidh 12. SiyaramBaidh, Son of Late Tulsi Baidh, Respondents No. 4 to 12 are all residents of village Parasi, P.O. & P.S.-Ichak, District- Hazaribag … Respondent(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. H.K. Shikarwar, Advocate For the State : Ms. Sunita Kumari, AC to Sr. S.C-II …...... 02/ 11.05.2026 Heard, the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. Since, the matter is in relation to the title of land, the petitioners now want to approach the Civil Court for declaration of their title over the land and get the revenue records corrected accordingly. 3. Prayer is allowed. 4. With the aforesaid liberty this application is disposed of as withdrawn. 5. If the petitioners approach the Civil Court by filing a suit claiming their right, title and interest and also for correction of the records, the same will be decided based on the documents, records and evidence produced before the Trial Court without being prejudiced by the order passed by the Circle Officer, Ichak, Hazaribagh in Miscellaneous Case No. 10 of 2024-25. Further, if a petition under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of CPC is filed by the petitioners along with the plaint, the same will be decided as expeditiously as possible. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 11th May, 2026 R.S./S.K.C. Uploaded on 13 /05/2026