[2026:RJ-JP:13335] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3764/2026 1. Manohar S/o Shri Chand, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Nandna, Police Station Mandawar, District Dausa. 2. Raju @ Rajendra S/o Shri Manohar, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Nandna, Police Station Mandawar, District Dausa. ----Applicants Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Deepesh Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP Mr. Abhishek Parashar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 30/03/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS on behalf of accused-applicants. The accused-applicants was arrested in connection with FIR No.182/2022 registered at Police Station Mandawar, District Dausa for the offence(s) under Sections 302 and 120-B of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the instant bail application is moved assailing the impugned anticipatory bail dismissal order dated 26.02.2026. It is submitted that the applicants are aged 58 and 33 respectively, and initially Final Report was proposed by the Police Authorities. It is further submitted that the applicants are being falsely implicated in the instant matter. In support of the contentions made insofar learned counsel has placed reliance upon the ratio encapsulated in Than [2026:RJ-JP:13335] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3764/2026] Singh & Ors. Vs. State of U.P. & Anr.: Criminal Miscellaneous Anticipatory Bail Application No. 2508/2025. 3. Per contra, learned Public prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the instant bail application, and have submitted that the learned Trial Court upon due consideration of facts have rejected the anticipatory bail application before it, with a speaking order, taking note of the investigation conducted. It is submitted that subsequently, cognizance was taken and two of the co-accused persons are already arrested, and that the instant applicant is absconding. 4. Heard and considered. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by counsel for the parties, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and taking note of the nature of allegations leveled, the fact that the applicant is absconding and two of the co-accused persons are already arrested, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present bail application. 6. Present bail application is accordingly, dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J PARSHANT /36