Gunnam Venkata Madhu Chandra Sekhar, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/11352/2026 · 2026-04-26
D Ramesh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1318 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1318 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010202502026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 11352/2026 Between:
1. GUNNAM VENKATA MADHU CHANDRA SEKHAR,, S/O LATE G. RAMANJANEYULU, AGED 41 YEARS, OCC. JUNIOR ASSISTANT, R/O. D.NO.32-2-20, GUNNAVARI STREET, NEAR SUBBARAYUDU TEMPLE, WARD-15, PALACOLE, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, RAYAPUDI POST, TULLURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE REGIONAL DIRECTORCUMAPPELLATE COMMISSIONER OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, , RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2
4. THE NARASAPURAM MUNICIPALITY, REP BY ITS MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, NARASAPURAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. SRI R V KRISHNA KANTH, JUNIOR ASSISTANT (NOW PROMOTED AS SENIOR ASSISTANT),
O/O.
TADEPALLIGUDEM MUNICIPALITY, TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction moref particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondent in issuing Proceedings Roc.No.507/2013/A1-19 dated 06.04.2026, whereby the 5th Respondent, who is junior to the petitioner in the cadre of Junior Assistants, has been granted temporary promotion as Senior Assistant (Category-IV) in APMMSS and posted to Tadepalligudem Municipality, while petitioners legitimate claim for consideration and promotion to the same cadre has been completely ignored, as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently quash the same and further direct the Respondents 1 to 3 to forthwith consider petitioners case for promotion to the post of Senior Assistant (Category-IV) in accordance with his seniority position with ail consequential service benefits, without prejudice to the pending disciplinary proceedings and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the operation of Proceedings Roc.No.507/2013/A1-19 dated 06.04.2026 issued by 3rd respondent and consequently direct: the respondents to complete the pending disciplinary enquiry arising out of
3
G.O.Rt.No.597 dated Respondents 17.06.2025 within a time-bound period after affording full opportunity of hearing to petitioner, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V VIJAYA VARDHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following:
ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as cots. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH
Date:27.04.2026 GK
4
5
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH
WRIT PETITION NO: 11352 of 2026
Dated:27.04.2026
GK