KULWANT SINGH DHILLON AND OTHERS v. RAMESH CHAND THE TEHSILDAR SALES NEW SECRETARIAT HARYANA PANIPAT AND ANOTHER
COCP/3829/2025 · 2026-05-04
Nidhi Gupta
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13177 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13177 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
COCP-3829
IN THE HI
107
Kulwant Sin
Ramesh Cha
CORAM: H
Present: -
NIDHI GUP
1.
violation of Court in CW The Tehsild petition was Authority to petitioners
2.
short reply Kumar, Teh Writ Court o 28.04.2026 ( of the petiti present petit 3829-2025
-1-
E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H
COCP Date o
nt Singh Dhillon and others
Versus
sh Chand and another
M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH
Mr. Dinesh Ghai, Advocate for
Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G.
I GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
The present contempt petitio on of order dated 10.01.2025 (Annex CWP-257-2025, titled as ‘Kulwant ehsildar (Sales), New Secretariat, n was disposed of with a directi rity to decide the application dated ners within a period of 06 months.
Learned counsel for the respond reply dated 29.04.2026 filed by wa r, Tehsildar (Sales), Panipat and subm ourt order dated 10.01.2025 (Annexu 2026 (Annexure R-1) has been passed petitioners has been rejected. As s t petition.
ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3829-2025 Date of Decision: 04.05.2026
.… Petitioners
.... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA te for the petitioners. l. A.G., Haryana. petition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by the Writ ulwant Singh Dhillon and others vs. ariat, Haryana’; whereby the writ direction to respondent/competent dated 11.11.2021 submitted by the espondent has handed over in Court by way of affidavit of Sh. Manoj d submits that in compliance of the nnexure P-1), Speaking Order dated assed by respondent whereby claim As such, nothing survives in the
ging Writ vs. writ tent the
anoj the ated laim the RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.06 11:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.
COCP-3829
3.
to learned co
4.
5.
required to b of, according
6.
Speaking O law, if so adv
7.
8.
04.05.2026 rishu
3829-2025
-2-
A copy of the short reply dated ned counsel for the petitioners.
Heard.
In view of the facts noted ed to be passed in the present petition ordingly.
The petitioners would be at libe
Order dated 28.04.2026 (Annexu so advised.
Rule stands discharged.
Pending application(s), if any, s 2026
Whether speaking/reasoned
Whether Reportable
dated 29.04.2026 has been supplied above, no further orders are tition; and the same stands disposed at liberty to challenge the aforesaid nnexure R-1), in accordance with any, shall also stand disposed of.
( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No
Yes/No lied are sed said with RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.06 11:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.