Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13176 (JHR)

MAHBOOB @ MEHBUB ANSARI v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4154/2026 · 2026-05-14

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:14865] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4154 of 2026 ------ Mahboob @ Mehbub Ansari, aged about 25 years, son of Wahid Ansari @ Wahid Mia, resident of village Subdidih, P.O. & P.S. Karmatanr, District Jamtara .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhishek Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shashi Kr. Verma, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-14-05-2026 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner files a Supplementary Affidavit. Let the same be kept in the record. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Karmatanr P.S. Case No.71 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No.545 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 309 (4) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed robbery and looted Rs.2,00,000/- kept in the drawer of the informant. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-03 of the Supplementary Affidavit, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is next submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. yet charge- sheet has been submitted against him without putting him on Test Identification Parade as mentioned in para-10 of the instant bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 09.02.2026 as has been mentioned in rejection order of the bail application of the petitioner. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamtara in connection with Karmatanr P.S. Case No.71 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No.545 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-14.05.2026-Animesh/