1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.9228 of 2026 Decided on: 25.06.2026 M/s Koshal Builders …..Petitioner Versus Union of India and others ..Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Lovneesh Singh Thakur, Advocate & Mr.Pankaj Chug, Advocate (through V.C). For the Respondents: Mr. Ajay Kumar Chauhan, Central Government Counsel, for respondents. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that several objections were pointed out in the writ petition; Time was consumed for removing the objections so pointed out; In the interregnum, some new documents surfaced reference of which was required to be given in the petition; Inadvertently, new document has been placed on record of old petition by changing the pleadings; This has resulted in different stamping dates on the writ petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in the interest of justice, petitioner be 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh in accordance with law after incorporating all events. 2. Granting such permission, the petition to stand disposed of as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua June 25, 2026 Judge yogesh