GULJAR SEKH ALIAS GULJAR SHEKH ALIAS GULZAR SK v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./3181/2026 · 2026-05-06
Anubha Rawat Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13173 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13173 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:13549
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 3181 of 2026
Guljar Sekh @ Guljar Shekh @ Gulzar Sk., son of Anul Sekh @ Enul Shekh
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… … Opp. Party
---
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner
: Mr. Arvind Kumar Choudhary, Advocate
For the Opp. Party
: Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Advocate
---
03/6th May 2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Jama P.S. Case No. 74 of 2025 for the offence registered under Sections 111, 319(2), 61(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) & 3(5) of BNS and Sections 66(C), 66(D) of the IT Act, now said to have been pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Dumka.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 23.11.2025 having no criminal antecedent and the charge-sheet has already been submitted. He submits that one mobile phone and one SIM card are alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. He has also submitted that the statement of none of the victim has been recorded so far.
3.
Learned counsel for the opposite party, while opposing the prayer for bail, does not dispute the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. However, he submits that in the online portal, three complaints have been found, but as per the case-diary, no FIR has been instituted apart from the present case.
4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the custody of the petitioner since 23.11.2025 having no criminal antecedent and that the charge-sheet has already been submitted, the petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-
2026:JHHC:13549
2
(Rs. Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Dumka in connection with Jama P.S. Case No. 74 of 2025, subject to the following conditions: - (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner would deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his Mobile Number before the learned court below, which he shall not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below.
5. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
6. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e- mail/FAX’.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)
Dated: 06.05.2026
Uploaded On: 09.05.2026
Mukul/-