[2026:RJ-JP:30509] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11308/2026 CNR: RJHC020594982026 | URN: CW / 25078U / 2026 Harshit Meena S/o Rameshwar, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Sunipur, Post Umreh, District Dholpur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Home, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Bank Of Baroda, Through Its Branch Manager, Address - Baseri Road, Main Bus Stand Badi, District Dholpur. 3. The Station House Officer, Police Station Ballabhgarh, District Faridabad, Haryana. 4. The Station House Officer, Police Station Akhandnagar, District Sultanpur, Uttar Pradesh. 5. Deputy Inspector General Of Police, Cyber Crime Police, Head Quarters, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Prasad Jogi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Munendra Singh Fauzdar on behalf of Mr. Saumitra Chaturvedi, Dy. G.C. Mr. Laxmikant Sharma with Ms. Shivani Paliwal on behalf of Mr. Ram Naresh Vijay HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 05/08/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition with a prayer to direct the respondent-Bank to defreeze the account, maintained by the petitioner with Bank of Baroda. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank submits that account of the petitioner has been freezed on the basis of information provided by the Investigating Authority. It has also [2026:RJ-JP:30509] (2 of 2) [CW-11308/2026] been informed that on account of complaint with regard to committing alleged cybercrime, there are disputed transactions of Layer-I in the bank account of the petitioner. 3. The said statement made by learned counsel for the respondent-Bank is supported by learned counsel for the respondent-Department. 4. Under these circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for granting liberty to approach the Competent Authority in view of Clause 10 of Grievance Redressal Mechanism of Section-III of the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) dated 02.01.2026 issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs. 5. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the present writ petition by granting liberty to the petitioner to avail his remedy under the aforesaid SOP and the Authorities are directed to dispose of the grievance of the petitioner within the timeframe given in the SOP. 6. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of. 7. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of this case. 8. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J 53/DAKSH