HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 16463 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel representing State-respondents and perused the record on board. 2. This writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following reliefs: "I- To issue a Writ Order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing to the respondents to decide the representation dated 29-06-2026 moved by petitioner within specific reasoned order. II- To issue a Writ Order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing to the respondents to provide the A.C.P. as working of permanent employee to the petitioner in the respondents department." 3. Sri Sanjeev Dubey, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Abhinava Krishna Srivastava, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 2 to 5 has contended that the grievance of the present petitioner regarding ACP as raised in the instant writ petition can be more appropriately redressed by the Municipal Commissioner (respondent No. 2), and he has no objection, in case, a direction is issued for expeditious disposal of a fresh representation to be moved by the petitioner within such stipulated period as may be directed by this Court. 4. In this conspectus, as above, no useful purpose would be served by keeping this matter pending. Therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition, without making any observation on the merits of the case, with liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the Municipal Commissioner (respondent No. 2), to ventilate his grievance, as averred in the present writ petition, within a Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Muhammad Azam Counsel for Respondent(s) : Abhinava Krishna Srivastava, C.S.C. Prabha .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) period of three weeks from today, along with a certified copy of this order and a self attested copy of the present writ petition, and, in turn, he shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably, within a period of three months from the date of production of such representation. 5. With the aforesaid observation, present writ petition is disposed of. October 7, 2026 vinay WRIA No. 16463 of 2026 2 (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad