KALUNATH S/O SHRI KISHANNATH JI v. DHIRAJ PATIDAR S/O SHRI SURAJPRAKASH JI
CW/4144/2026 · 2026-03-30
Anuroop Singhi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1317 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1317 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:13419] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4144/2026 Kalunath S/o Shri Kishannath Ji, Aged About 71 Years, R/o Ramthi Bhawanimandi, Tehsil Pachpahad, District Jhalawar. ----Petitioner Versus
1. Dhiraj Patidar S/o Shri Surajprakash Ji, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Dhityakhedi, Tehsil Jhalrapatan, District Jhalawar.
2. Premchand S/o Shri Jagnnath Ji, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Near Kalwa Place, Bhawanimandi, District Jhalawar.
3. Lala Garg S/o Shri Matadin Ji, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Jaipuriya Mill, Bhawanimandi, District Jhalawar.
4. Mustkim S/o Kallu Kunjda, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Front Of Nagrik Bank, Bhawanimandi, District Jhalawar.
5. Vivek Jain S/o Shri Barijraj Ji, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Near Aarash School, Bhawanimandi, District Jhalawar.
6. Radhesyam Paliwal S/o Shri Namalum Ji, R/o Near Khatu Shyam Ji Temple, Jaipuriya Mill, Bhawanimandi, District Jhalawar.
7. Anwar Hussain S/o Namalum Ji, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Front Of Kalwa Temple, Jaipuriya Mill, Bhawanimandi, District Jhalawar.
8. State Of Rajasthan, Through Tehsildar, Tehsil Pachpahad, District Jhalawar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lalit Singh Rathore for Mr. Arun Singh Shekhawat For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI
Order 30/03/2026
Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, confines his submission to the limited extent of praying for liberty to file an appropriate application seeking early hearing of the
[2026:RJ-JP:13419] (2 of 2) [CW-4144/2026] revision petition before the learned Board of Revenue, Ajmer, Rajasthan. Considering the said limited submission so made, the writ petition stands disposed of with liberty to petitioner to file an application seeking early hearing of the revision petition and in the event of any such application being filed, the learned Board of Revenue is expected to decide the same in accordance with law. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
(ANUROOP SINGHI),J JAYANT KUMAR /79