1 APHC010034642021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY, THE 15th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NOs: 55 and 138 OF 2021 CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 55 OF 2021 Between: 1. GUDLA KRISHNA MURTHY, S/O. THAMMI RAJU, AGED 60 YEARS, RIO D.NO. 58-14-40/2A, PLOT NO. HIG-65, MARRIPALEM, VUDA LAYOUT, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATHI. 2. KANAKALA CHANDRA LEELA, W/O K. APPA RAO, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O 58-14-88/11 MARRIPALEM, VUDA LAYOUT, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 138/2021 Between: 1. GUDLA KRISHNA MURTHY, S/O THAMMI RAJU, AGED 60 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 58-14-40/2A, PLOT NO. HIG-65, MARRIPALEM, VUDA LAYOUT, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC 2 PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATHI. 2. KANAKALA CHANDRA LEELA, W/O K. APPA RAO, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O 58-14-88/1B MARRIPALEM, VUDA LAYOUT, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. REDDY VENKATA RAMANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. BVSS BALAKRISHNA RANJIT The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER: These two Criminal Revision Cases are heard together and are being disposed of by this common order, as the Petitioner in both cases is the same. 2. These two Criminal Revision Cases have been filed under Sections 397 read with 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity, ‘the Cr.P.C.’)/Sections 438 read with 442 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity, ‘the BNSS’), challenging the docket order dated 19.02.2020 passed by the learned XIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam at Gajuwaka, in Crl.A.Nos.609 and 610 of 2018. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Perused the record. 4. These Criminal Revision Cases have been filed challenging the order cancelling the bail granted to the Petitioner and suspending the sentence, as the Petitioner/Appellant had failed to appear before the learned Appellate 3 Court. Without going into the merits or demerits of the matter, these Criminal Revision Cases are disposed of, directing the learned Appellate Court to dispose of the Criminal Appeals in accordance with law, after affording due and sufficient opportunity to both parties, as early as possible, and submit a report to the Registrar (Judicial). 5. In the result, the Criminal Revision Cases are disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dated: 15.10.2026 KMS 4 124 HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO Crl.R.C.Nos.55 and 138of 2021 Dated: 15.10.2026 KMS