GOURANGA SINGHA AND ANR v. NARAYAN KONWAR AND 6 ORS.
Cont.Cas(C)/98/2024 · 2026-08-26
Arun Dev Choudhury
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13168 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13168 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010028802024
2026:GAU-AS:12331
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/98/2024 GOURANGA SINGHA AND ANR S/O- LATE TANU BABU SINGHA, VILL.- DHALIDAHAR, P.O. JANAKI BAZAR, P.S. PANCHGRAM, DIST.- HAILAKANDI, ASSAM 2: BHANU LEKHA SINHA D/O- BIDYA SENA SINHA VILL.- KALINAGAR PART-IV P.O. KALINAGAR P.S. PANCHGRAM DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSA VERSUS NARAYAN KONWAR AND 6 ORS.
THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM, ELEMENTARY EDUCATION DEPTT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 6.
2:JAYANT NARLIKAR COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GHY-6.
3:SURANJANA SENAPATI DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GHY-19.
4:TRIDIB ROY THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER HAILAKANDI P.O.
Page No.# 2/3 P.S. AND DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM 5:TRIDIB ROY THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS HAILAKANDI P.O.
P.S. AND DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM 6:BISWAJIT PAUL TREASURY OFFICER HAILAKANDI P.O.
P.S. AND DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM 7:RAJESH CHAKRABORTY THE BLOCK ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER HAILAKANDI P.O.
P.S. AND DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A M BARBHUIYA, MS S R MAZARBHUIYA,MS A BEGUM,S. M. ZINNA Advocate for the Respondent : MR A CHALIHA (r-2), MR. B TALUKDAR(R-3),MR S M T CHISTIE(R-3,5,4),MR. D SAIKIA(R-3),MR P NAYAK (r-2),MR. B GOGOI (r-2)
BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
ORDER
27-08-2026
1. Heard Ms. S.R. Mazarbhuiya, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. A. Chaliha, learned Standing counsel, Finance Department and Mr. S.M.T.Chistie, learned Standing counsel, Department of School Education for the respondents.
Page No.# 3/3
2. Ms. Mazarbhuiya, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the order dated 23.09.2022, passed in WP(C) No. 1689/2022 has already been complied with.
3. In view of such submission, the present contempt petition stands closed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant