RAVINDER KUMAR v. UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM AND OTHERS
CWP/10710/2026 · 2026-04-08
Jagmohan Bansal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13167 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13167 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
**** 156
CWP-10710-2026 Date of Decision: 08.04.2026
RAVINDER KUMAR
...Petitioner Vs.
UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM AND ORS. …Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present:- Mr. Ravinder Kumar Rana, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. Ravish Kaushik, Advocate for respondent
*** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
1.
The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of memo whereby respondent has raised demand of electricity charges of Rs.2,65,886/-.
2.
Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that impugned
order may be set aside with liberty to pass fresh order in view of
judgment of this Court in “Rattan Singh Vs. State of Haryana & Ors.”, LawFinder Doc ID #2869383.
3.
Disposed of in terms of Rattan Singh (supra).
4.
Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL)
JUDGE April 08, 2026 Deepak DPA
Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable
Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.04.08 17:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document