Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13167 (PNJ)

RAVINDER KUMAR v. UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM AND OTHERS

CWP/10710/2026 · 2026-04-08

Jagmohan Bansal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 156 CWP-10710-2026 Date of Decision: 08.04.2026 RAVINDER KUMAR ...Petitioner Vs. UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM AND ORS. …Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Ravinder Kumar Rana, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Ravish Kaushik, Advocate for respondent *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of memo whereby respondent has raised demand of electricity charges of Rs.2,65,886/-. 2. Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that impugned order may be set aside with liberty to pass fresh order in view of judgment of this Court in “Rattan Singh Vs. State of Haryana & Ors.”, LawFinder Doc ID #2869383. 3. Disposed of in terms of Rattan Singh (supra). 4. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE April 08, 2026 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.04.08 17:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document