Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13164 (KAR)

SMT. RUKMINIYAMMA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/14367/2023 · 2026-03-06

R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13882 WP No. 14367 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 14367 OF 2023 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. RUKMINIYAMMA W/O HANUMANTHARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O, VADDERAHALLI, VEERASAGARA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK. BANGALORE – 560 064 2. SMT. NARASAMMA W/O. RANGAHANUMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/O VADDERAHALLI, VEERASAGARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE - 560 064 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C.N. MAHADESHWARAN, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE – 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, BEHIND KANDAYA BHAVAN, Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13882 WP No. 14367 of 2023 K.G.ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 009 3. THE TAHASILDAR NES OFFICE ROAD, YELAHANKA TALUK, YELAHANKA, BANGALORE - 560 064 4. THE RAJIV GANDHI HOUSING CORPORATION LIMITED, REGISTERED COMPANY ACT 1965 KAVERI BHAVAN, 9TH FLOOR, E AND F BLOCK, K.G.ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 009, REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 5. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER YELAHANKA TALUK PANCHAYATH, YELAHANKA, BANGALORE – 560 064 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA FOR R1 TO R3; SRI. MRUTHYUNJAYA R.B, ADVOCATE FOR R4; R5 SERVED) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TOSETTING ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD 06.06.2023 AT ANNX-A PASSED BY THE R-2 IN RESPECT OF PETITIONER 1 AND 2 CONSEQUENTLY SO FAR PETITIONER ONLY DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT TO CONFIRM THE ALLOTMENTS OF SITES BEARING NO. 358 AND 255 MADE IN FAVOUR OF PETITIONER NO.1 AND 2 AS PER THE HAKKU PATRAS REGISTERED BEFORE THE SUB REGISTRAR AS DOCUMENT NO. 2733/2021-22 AND DOCUMENT NO. 2730/2021-22 ON 29.07.2021 VIDE ANNX-B AND B1 RESPECTIVELY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13882 WP No. 14367 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER The grievances of the petitioners individually are directed against the impugned order at Annexure ‘A’ dated 06.06.2023 whereby the second respondent-Deputy Commissioner, Bengaluru Urban District, has proceeded to quash the grants made in favour of 218 beneficiaries and at Sl.Nos.145 and 68 are the names of the petitioners. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that without verifying the correct facts, the Deputy Commissioner has cancelled all the grants on the ground that the Hakkupatras granted in favour of the petitioners have not been duly registered in the office of the jurisdictional Sub-Registrar and that the petitioners are not residing in the properties granted to them. 3. Learned Counsel draws the attention of this Court to Annexures ‘B’ and ‘B1’ which are the registered documents and submits that the information provided to - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13882 WP No. 14367 of 2023 the Deputy Commissioner insofar as the petitioners are concerned is incorrect. 4. Learned Counsel submits that the Hakkupatras issued to the petitioners have been duly registered in the office of the Sub-Registrar, Gandhinagar, (Kacharakanahalli), Bengaluru on 29.07.2021 and the petitioners have put up constructions and are residing in the lands in question. 5. Consequently, the writ petition is allowed. The impugned order at Annexure ‘A’ dated 06.06.2023 passed by the respondent-Deputy Commissioner, Bengaluru Urban District, Bengaluru, insofar as the petitioners are concerned is hereby quashed and set aside. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE JT/- CT:BSR