Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13161 (RAJ)

NAVRATAN S/O HEMRAJ v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/9648/2026 · 2026-08-04

Bipin Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9648/2026 CNR: RJHC020581452026 | URN: CRLMB / 17887U / 2026 Navratan S/o Hemraj, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Ward No. 17, Uniara, Police Station Uniara, District Tonk, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In District Jail, District Tonk). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nitin Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 04/08/2026 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 05.06.2026 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Uniara, District-Tonk in Bail application No.131/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.106/2026, Police Station-Uniara, District-Tonk for the offences under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 61(2)(a) of the BNS, 2023, and Section 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner of having committed any offence of similar nature or any other nature. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the challan in the case has already been filed and the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time and even the offences are triable by the (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9648/2026] Magistrate, therefore, he prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail as the accused is in custody since 27.05.2026. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon consideration of the arguments advanced that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner of having committed any offence of a similar nature or any other nature; the challan in the case has already been filed and the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time; even the offences are triable by the Magistrate, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted. 7. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner namely Navratan S/o Hemraj arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.106/2026, Police Station- Uniara, District-Tonk, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court; (ii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which they are accused, or suspected, of the commission of which they are suspected; (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9648/2026] (iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; and (iv) In the event the petitioner is found involved in any other cyber fraud case in the future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned trial Court for cancellation of the bail granted herein. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 41/JUBIN