- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22394 RSA No. 901 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 901 OF 2024 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: SRI KODAPPA S/O. LATE CHIKKA HANUMAIAH DEAD BY LRS. HANUMANTHARAYAPPA S/O. LATE KODAPPA DEAD BY LRS. 1. SRI SRINIVASA @ SEENAPPA S/O. LATE HANUMANTHARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS. 2. SRI NAGARAJU S/O. LATE HANUMANTHARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS. BOTH ARE R/AT BRAHMADEVARAHALLI VILLAGE MEDIGESHI HOBLI MADHUGIRI TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 101. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI G.S. VENKAT SUBBA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: SRIHANUMANTHARAYAPPA S/O. HANUMANTHAIAH DEAD BY LRS. 1. SMT. LAKKAMMA W/O. LATE HANUMANTHARAYAPPA Digitally signed by B LAVANYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22394 RSA No. 901 of 2024 AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS. 2. SRI. HANUMANTHARAYAPPA S/O. LATE HANUMANTHARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS. 3. SRI. OBANNA S/O. LATE HANUMANTHARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS. SRI. NAGARAJU S/O. HANUMANTHARAYAPPA DEAD BY LRS. 1 TO 3 ALL ARE R/AT HOSAHALLI VILLAGE MEDIGESHI HOBLI MADHUGIRI TALUK TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 572 101. 4. SMT. JAYAMMA W/O. LATE NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS. 5. SWAPNA D/O. LATE NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS. 6. SAVINA D/O. LATE NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS. 7. ASHWINI D/O. LATE NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS. 8. ROOPA D/O. LATE NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS. R/AT ARE RESIDING NO.4 TO 8 - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22394 RSA No. 901 of 2024 HOSAHALLI VILLAGE CHINNENAHALLI POST MEDIGESHI HOBLI MADHUGIRI TALUK TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 572 101. 9. SMT. RATHNAMMA W/O. LATE GOVINDAPPA MAJOR, SHANKARAGALLU VILLAGE RALLAPALLI POST MADAKASIRA MANDAL AND TALUK ANANTHAPURA DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH STATE - 515 001. 10. SHARADAMMA W/O. ASHWATHAPPA MAJOR, KODIGENAHALLI MADHUGIRI TALUK - 572 227. 11. SRI NAGARAJU S/O. GIRIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS R/AT HOSAHALLI VILLAGE CHINNENAHALLI POST MEDIGESHI HOBLI MADHUGIRI TALUK - 572 101 TUMAKURU DISTRICT. 12. SMT. JAYAMMA D/O. GIRIYAPPA W/O. ESWARAPPA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS R/AT IDLADI VILLAGE BULLASANDRA POST MADAKASIRA MANDAL & TALUK ANANTHAPURA DISTRICT - 515 001 ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 13. SMT. THIMMAKKA D/O. GIRIYAPPA W/O. MALLAIAH - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22394 RSA No. 901 of 2024 AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS R/AT HARESAMUDRAM VILLAGE BULLASANDRA POST MADAKASIRA MANDAL & TALUK ANANTHAPURA DISTRICT - 515 001 ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. HANUMANTHARAYAPPA S/O. LATE KODAPPA DEAD BY LRS. 14. SMT. DODDARANGAMMA W/O. LATE HANUMANTHARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS. 15. SRI. MUDDAPPA S/O. LATE HANUMANTHARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS. 16. SRI. RANGANATHA S/O. LATE HANUMANTHARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS. SRI. KATTAPPA DEAD BY LRS. 17. SMT. LAKKAMMA W/O. LATE KATTAPPA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS. 18. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA W/O. LATE KATTAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS. 19. MANJULA D/O. LATE KATTAPPA AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS MINOR, REPRESENTED BY NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER SMT. LAKSHMAMMA. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22394 RSA No. 901 of 2024 R AT NO.18 TO 20 BRAHMADEVARAHALLI VILLAGE MEDIGESHI HOBLI MADHUGIRI TALUK - 572 101. 20. THIMMAIAH S/O. LATE KODAPPA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS. 21. SRI. PUTTAPPA S/O. LATE KODAPPA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS. 22. LAKKAMMA D/O. LATE KODAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. ALL ARE R/AT 20 TO 22 BRAHMADEVARAHALLI VILLAGE MEDIGESHI HOBLI MADHUGIRI TALUK - 572 101. …RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20.01.2024 PASSED IN RA.NO.142/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MADHUGIRI, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 29.04.2016 PASSED IN OS.NO.219/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MADHUGIRI. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22394 RSA No. 901 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for appellants is present. 2. The objections raised by Registry has not been rectified, despite the matter having been listed for the sixth time; moreover, the cost imposed by this Court has not been paid. Therefore, this Court finds no justification to grant any further adjournment. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE CPN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10