BABAN TULSHIRAM SURADKAR v. SANJAY DIKALE THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORD AURANGABAD AND OTHERS
CP/113/2020 · 2026-09-28
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13161 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13161 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
113.20CP 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 3 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 113 OF 2020 IN WRIT PETITION NO.9235 OF 2018 BABAN TULSHIRAM SURADKAR VERSUS SANJAY DIKALE THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORD AURANGABAD & OTHERS ... AGP for Respondent-State : Mr.N.B.Patil ...
CORAM :
SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ. DATE : 28.09.2026 P.C. : 1] None for the petitioner. 2] It appears from the record that the petitioner had not removed office objections and the respondent no.1 remained unserved due to his retirement. No steps are taken thereafter. Thus, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the matter, As such, the Contempt Petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE] JUDGE JUDGE DDC 2026:BHC-AUG:44688-DB