$~94 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5125/2026 and CRL.M.A. 21512/2026, CRL.M.A. 21513/2026, CRL.M.A. 21514/2026 VIPUL GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Counsel (appearance not given) versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP. SI Vivek PS Neb sarai. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 23.07.2026 1. The respondent no.2 is the complainant, who is not present. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that if the notice be issued to respondent no.2, there is possibility of settlement between the parties. 3. The Court declines to accept the aforesaid prayer. 4. The quashment of the FIR has to be voluntarily. If respondent no.2 comes forward, the Court shall consider the same in accordance with law. 5. At this stage, the petition for quashment cannot be accepted. Accordingly, the petition, along with pending applications, stands disposed of. 6. Liberty is, however, granted to the petitioner to file a fresh petition on merit, if he so desires. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J JULY 23, 2026/aks This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/07/2026 at 11:34:44