19-CA.11101.2026 with connected mattters IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 928 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11101 OF 2026 IN X-OBJST/22956/2026 Tukaram Daulat Nhavi. VERSUS The Colletor, Jalgaon And Ors. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11100 OF 2026 IN X-OBJST/22959/2026 AND 929 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11104 OF 2026 IN X-OBJST/22951/2026 Sitaram Namdeo Teli Deceased Thr. Lrs Kamalbai And Others. VERSUS The Collector, Jalgaon And Ors. AND 931 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11111 OF 2026 IN X-OBJST/22929/2026 Dagdu Bhavdu Bari (died) Thr Lrs Dhrupadbai. VERSUS The Colletor, Jalgaon, Dist Jalgaon And Ors. AND 932 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11113 OF 2026 IN X-OBJST/22945/2026 Shantabaitukaram Shelke (died) Thr. Lrs. Devkabai And Ors. VERSUS The Collector, Jalgaon And Ors. 2026:BHC-AUG:44203 2 19-CA.11101 AND 934 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11124 OF 2026 IN X-OBJST/22964/2026 Nathabai Bhika Pardeshi. VERSUS The Collector, Jalgaon And Ors. AND 935 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11125 OF 2026 IN X-OBJST/22914/2026 Pandurang Fakira Teli And Ors. VERSUS The Collector, Jalgaon And Ors. AND 936 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11195 OF 2026 IN X-OBJST/22968/2026 Bhimrao Narayan Dhobi (died) Thr Lrs Vatsalabai And Ors. VERSUS The Collector, Jalgaon And Ors. ---- Mr.Vinod Patil, Advocate for applicants Mr.S.P.Sonpavale, Mr.R.K.Ingole, Mr.A.V.Lavte, Mr.K.B.Jadhvar and Mr.S.N.Kendre, AGPs for respondent nos.1 and 2 - State in respective matter Mr.Bhaktaraj L. Patil, Advocate h/f. Mr.A.D.Pawar, Advocate for respondent nos.3 and 4 in C.A. Nos.11101/2026, 11100/2026, 11111/2026, 11113/2026, 11124/2026, 11125/2026, 11195/2026 Mr.S.V.Chillarge, Advocate for respondent nos.3 and 4 in C.A. No.11104 of 2026 ---- CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 24, 2026 3 19-CA.11101 ORDER :- Heard Mr.Vinod Patil, learned advocate for the applicants. These applications are filed seeking condonation of delay caused in filing the Cross-Objections in the First Appeals filed by the acquiring body. There is delay of 1538 days caused in filing the Cross- Objections. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the merit of the judgment and award passed by the reference court is under challenge before this court in the First Appeals. He submits that seeking enhancement in the compensation is a statutory right of the claimants and hence instead of filing separate First Appeals, the Cross-Objections are filed. No prejudice will be caused to other side if the same are heard on merit. He further submits that the applicants are ready to waive the statutory benefits and interest for the delayed period. 2. Issue notice to the respondents. Learned AGP waives notice for respondent nos.1 and 2. Mr.A.D.Pawar and Mr.S.V.Chillarge, learned panelled advocates waive for the respondents – acquiring body in the respective matter. 3. For the reasons stated in the applications, the applications are allowed. Delay caused in filing the Cross-Objections stands condoned. Cross-Objection be registered. 4 19-CA.11101 Order in Cross-Objections:- 4. Issue notice to the respondents. Learned AGP waives notice for respondent nos.1 and 2 and Mr.A.D.Pawar and Mr.S.V.Chillarge, learned advocates waive notice for respondent nos.3 and 4 in respective matter. [AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.] ……….. KBP