1 20 (i).doc (Corrections have been carried out in view of ‘Speaking to the Minutes’ order dated 30.09.2026) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 20 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 646 OF 2024 AAYUB BANIMIYA SHAIKH VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ... WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2279 OF 2024 IN ABA/646/2024 ... Advocate for the Applicant : Mr. Jadhav Satej S a/w. Mr. Qureshi Aqif Hameed APP for Respondent/State : Mr. S.B. Jadhav … CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J. DATE : 28.09.2026 PER COURT : . After hearing learned counsels for both the sides, when this court has shown disinclination to grant any relief to the applicant, learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the application. The Anticipatory Bail Application is, therefore, dismissed as withdrawn. Pending Application stands disposed of. 2. Prima-facie, there is material on record indicating that other office bearers, including the Chairman of the Credit Society is involved in the crime in question. It seems that, despite the material available on record, no investigating is conducted in that regard. Therefore, before passing any order, it is necessary to afford an opportunity of hearing to 2026:BHC-AUG:45378 2 20 (i).doc the Investigating Officers, who, according to the learned APP are two in number. 3. Issue notice to both the Investigating Officers returnable on 05.10.2026, calling upon them to show cause as to why the appropriate order should not be passed against them, in accordance with law. ( R. M. JOSHI, J. ) V.S.Joshi