Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13150 (CHH)

GULAB BAI v. JANAKRAM SAHU

MAC/541/2021 · 2026-03-13

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:12351 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR NATIONAL LOK ADALAT Judge - Lok Adalat : Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Member - Lok Adalat : Mr. Apoorva Tripathi, Advocate. MAC No. 541 of 2021 1 - Gulab Bai W/o Late Deviram Aged About 32 Years Caste Yadav. 2 - Anish Kumar Yadav S/o Late Deviram Aged About 14 Years Caste Yadav. 3 - Manish Kumar Yadav S/o Late Deviram Aged About 11 Years Caste Yadav, 4 - Hitesh Kumar Yadav S/o Late Deviram Aged About 7 Years Caste Yadav. Appellant Nos. 2 to 4 Minor Represented Through Mother Gulab Bai W/o Deviram, Aged About 32 Years. 5 - Kamla Yadav S/o Teejram Aged About 63 Years. 6 - Kaushilya Bai W/o Kamla Yadav Aged About 49 Years. All are R/o Village Pendri, Police Station Hirri, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Appellants/Claimants. versus 1 - Janakram Sahu S/o Devi Prasad Sahu Aged About 27 Years Occupation Driver, R/o Sahu Mohalla, Taraud, Police Station Akaltara, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh (Driver Of Highwa No. C. G.- 10-A D-7011) AVINASH SHARMA Digitally signed by AVINASH SHARMA Date: 2026.03.16 10:52:23 +0530 2 2 - Agrawal Infrabuild Private Limited Address First Floor, V. R. Plaza, Link Road, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh (Owner Of Highwa No. C. G.- 10-A D-7011) 3 - I. C. I. C. I. Lombard General Insurance Company Limited Through The Branch Manager, Branch Office- Guru Kripa Tower, Vyapar Vihar Road, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh (Insurer Of Highwa No. C. G.- 10-A D- 7011). ... Respondents. (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Appellants : Ms. Deeksha Jaiswal appears on behalf of Shri Goutam Khetrapal, Advocates. For Respondent No.3 : Shri Sourabh Sharma, Advocate. AWARD (Passed on 14/03/2026) 1. The Parties have filed a docket/compromise petition stating therein that Respondent/Insurance Company has agreed to pay additional amount of Rs. 2,50,000/- (Two Lakhs Fifty Thousand only) within a period of 60 days from today. The docket is duly filled-in and signed by both the parties. 2. The compromise sought for by the parties is permitted and the matter in hand stands disposed of. 3. The docket be made part of this record. 4. A copy of the compromise arrived at between the parties (docket) be sent to the Claims Tribunal along with its record, if any, and a copy of the award 3 passed today, forthwith. Conditions imposed by the Claims Tribunal will remain intact. Sd/- Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) (Apoorva Tripathi) Judge - Lok Adalat Member - Lok Adalat High Court of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh Avinash