Mohamed Sathik @ Muhamathu Sathick v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Awps-Keelakkarai
CRL OP(MD)/6341/2026 · 2026-03-30
R Vijayakumar
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1315 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1315 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl. O.P.(MD) No.6341 of 2026, BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.03.2026
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Crl.O.P(MD).No.6341 of 2026 Mohamed Sathik @ Muhamathu Sathick .. Petitioner - Vs. -
1. State of Tamilnadu Rep by, The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Keelakkarai, Ramanathapuram District. Crime No.11 of 2021.
2. Dhasbuniha @ Thasbunisha .. Respondents
Prayer : To call for the records pertaining to Impugned Charge Sheet in S.C.No.197 of 2025 pending on the file of the Fast Track Mahila Court, Ramanathapuram and Quash the same.
For Petitioner : Ms.S.Meena For R1 : Mr.A.Albert James, Government Advocate (Crl. side) For R2 : Mr.S.Vishnuvardhan 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl. O.P.(MD) No.6341 of 2026,
ORDER The present criminal original petition has been filed by the petitioner/sole accused in S.C.No.197 of 2025 pending on the file of the Fast Track Mahila Court, Ramanathapuram, seeking to quash the charge sheet wherein the petitioner has been charged for the offence under Sections 366, 417, 376(2)(n) and 506(2) of IPC.
2. A perusal of the charge sheet reveals that the petitioner is said to have had physical relationship with the defacto complainant on several occasions on false promise of marriage and thereafter he has refused to marry the defacto complainant.
3. Pending trial, the defacto complainant got married to the third party and she had entered into compromise with the petitioner/sole accused and a Joint Compromise Memo has been filed, wherein the de- facto complainant agreed for quashing of the charge sheet . Today, the de- facto complainant is present in person and she also acknowledges the 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl. O.P.(MD) No.6341 of 2026, fact that she has agreed for quashing of the charge sheet as against the petitioner/sole accused.
4. Considering the fact that the defacto complainant has married to a third party and she does not want to prosecute the present criminal case as against the petitioner/sole accused, the charge sheet in S.C.No.197 of 2025 pending on the file of the Fast Track Mahila Court, Ramanathapuram, is hereby quashed. Consequently, the criminal original petition is allowed. The Joint Compromise Memo filed by the parties shall be treated as part and parcel of this order. 30.03.2026 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No PJL To 1.Fast Track Mahila Court, Ramanathapuram.
2. The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station,Keelakkarai, Ramanathapuram District.
3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl. O.P.(MD) No.6341 of 2026, R.VIJAYAKUMAR
, J.
PJL Crl.O.P(MD).No.6341 of 2026 30.03.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis