Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13148 (JHR)

BINAY KUMAR ALIAS VINAY KUMAR v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.Rev./1083/2023 · 2026-05-13

Pradeep Kumar Srivastava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:14648 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 1083 of 2023 -------- Binay Kumar @ Vinay Kumar, aged about 37 years, S/o. Dhirendra Nath Chaudhary, R/o. H. No. 42, Padma Raod, 10 No. Basti, P.S. Sidhgora, P.O.- Golmuri, Dist.- Jamshedpur. ... ... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Bimlesh Kumar Gautam @ Pintu Choubey, S/o. Jaiprakash Choubey, R/o. E-7, Ganga Jamuna Apartment, Dhalbhum Road, P.O. & P.S.- Sakchi, Dist.- Jamshedpur …… Opp. Parties -------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA -------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Navneet Sahay, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Bandana Sinha, A.P.P. For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate : Mr. Pratik Singh, Advocate : Ms. Vinita Prakash, Advocate Order No. 25/ Dated: 13th May, 2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this revision application with a liberty to raise all the points taken in this revision as ground during trial of the case. 2. Learned A.P.P. and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 have raised no objection. 3. In view of the above, this Criminal Revision application is dismissed as withdraw with the aforesaid liberty. (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) 13.05.2026 Rahul Uploaded on 15/05/2026