1 2026:CGHC:519 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3 of 2026 1 - Rajkumar Ratre S/o Dhansay Ratre Aged About 37 Years Occupation- Assistant Teacher (Lb), R/o Nagar Nigam Chilhati, Tanki Para, Police Station- Sarkanda, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Director Public Education Directorate, Indrawati Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Joint Director Education Department Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Collector Bilaspur District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 5 - The District Education Officer Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 6 - The Division Level Rationalization Representation Redressal Committee Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Ayush Lal, Advocate For Respondents/State : Ms. Anuja Sharma, Dy. Government Advocate SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 06/01/2026 2 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking for the following relief(s):- “10.1. That the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the concerned petitioner case from the possessions of the respondents for its kind perusal. 10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set-aside / quash the impugned order dated 04.06.2025 (Annexure P-2), and direct the respondent authorities to conduct the counseling of the petitioner again with the due process of law by considering the seniority of the petitioner. 10.3 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to provide appointment to the petitioner in her current school i.e. Government Primary School, Karra Limtara, Masturi, District - Bilaspur (C.G.). 10..4 That, the cost of the petition may also be given to the petitioner by the respondent authorities. 10.5 Any other relief may also be granted to the petitioner which this Hon’ble Court deemed fit in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition at this stage. 3. In view of the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY Date: 2026.01.07 11:23:47 +0530