Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13139 (JHR)

ARUN KUMAR RAM v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./2254/2026 · 2026-05-06

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:13571 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2254 of 2026 ------ Arun Kumar Ram, son of Anuj Ram, resident of Mukhiya Danga, Bhilaipahari, P.O. MGM, P.S. MGM, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner : Mr. J.N. Upadhyay, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sinha, A.P.P. ------ 02/06.05.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with MGM (Mango Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 180 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118, 352, 351(2), 190, 191(2), 192(3), 109 and 303(2) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamshedpur. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation is made against the petitioner that by way of calling on phone, he has stated he is going high. Apart from this, there is no allegation against the petitioner. He submits that allegations are there against co-accused for cutting of pipe from the house of the informant. He further submits that petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in para 17 of the petition. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that allegations are there of calling and threatening. 5. Considering that only allegation against the petitioner is there that he has called the informant and stated that he is going high, apart from that there is no allegation and allegation of cutting the pipe from the house of the informant is against another co-accused and the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in para 17 of the petition, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the above-named petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks from today and in 2026:JHHC:13571 the event of his arrest or surrender, he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamshedpur, in connection with MGM (Mango Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 180 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Anit Uploaded 08.05.2026