IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7039 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-328 Year-2025 Thana- KONCH District- Gaya ====================================================== 1. Ranjit Kumar Son of Dineshwar Yadav Resident of village- Daulatpur PS -Konch Distt -Gaya (Gayaji) 2. Sanjay yadav @ Sanjay Kumar Son of Dineshwar Yadav Resident of village- Daulatpur PS -Konch Distt -Gaya (Gayaji) 3. Amarjit Yadav @ Amarjit Kumar son of Dineshwar yadav Resident of village- Daulatpur PS -Konch Distt -Gaya (Gayaji) 4. Ranjay Yadav @ Ranjay Kumar son of Vineshwar Yadav @ Bineshwar Yadav Resident of village- Daulatpur PS -Konch Distt -Gaya (Gayaji) 5. Dhananjay Yadav @ Dhananjay Kumar son of Vineshwar Yadav @ Bineshwar Yadav Resident of village- Daulatpur PS -Konch Distt -Gaya (Gayaji) ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Yogesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 19-02-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 110, 74, 352, 351(2) and 324(2) of the B.N.S.. 3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, abused and assaulted informant and his family members by Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7039 of 2026(2) dt.19-02-2026 2/3 means of iron rod, lathi and pistol. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, both parties are descendants of the same ancestor and on account of trivial dispute, altercation took place which led to maar-peet between the parties in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-case. The present case is counter-blast of Konch P.S. Case No. 327 of 2025 which was lodged by petitioners’ side against informant and others. Petitioners claim clean antecedents. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, case and counter-case between the parties and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed. 7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7039 of 2026(2) dt.19-02-2026 3/3 amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-VIII, Gaya in connection with Konch P.S. Case No. 328 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.. shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T