Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13134 (AP)

K. Amaravathi v. Sri Sumit Kumar, I.A.S.

CC/369/2026 · 2026-10-09

Ninala Jayasurya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010700612025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] SATURDAY, THE 10th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 369 OF 2026 Between: 1. K. AMARAVATHI,, W/O. NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST RIO. NAKABALEPALLI VILLAGE, RAMAKUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI SUMIT KUMAR I A S, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. SRI K SRINIVASA RAJU, THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER/SUB- COLLECTOR, KUPPAM (ERSTWHILE MADANAPALLI), CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. SRI B KOWLESH, THE TAHSILDAR,RAMAKUPPAM, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. SRI V N HARI PRASAD, VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, BANDARLAPALLI PANCHAYAT, RAMAKUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, 5. SRI KISHOR, THE MANDAL SURVEYOR, RAMAKUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N YASODA KUMARI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. SUSHMA YAGANTI The Court made the following ORDER: At the time of considering the matter Mrs. Sushma Yaganti, learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that in view of the specific averments made in the counter affidavit at para No.7 that the official respondents have not disturbed or interfered with the subject land in any manner, the Contempt Case may be closed. The said fact has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. No costs. NINALA JAYASURYA,J Date:10.10.2026 Ssv Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 369 OF 2026 Date:10.10.2026 Ssv