Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.(C) 9736/2026
$~81 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9736/2026 & CM APPL. 45464/2026, CM APPL.
45465/2026, CM APPL. 45466/2026
COMMISIONER OF POLICE & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Raktim Gogoi, CGSC, alongwith Mr. Kanhaiya Singla, Mr. Kaushlendra Dutt Pandey and Ms. Akshita Nigam, Advs.
versus
RAMPUTR GURJAR
....Respondent Through: Ms. Anjali Singh and Ms. Jyoti, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR
O R D E R (ORAL) %
20.07.2026
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
1. After some hearing, Mr. Raktim Gogoi, learned CGSC for the petitioners, submits that the petitioners would comply with the order of the Tribunal and reconsider the case of the respondent keeping in view the principles contained in Avtar Singh v. Union of India1 and other applicable decisions on that point.
2. The petitioners would also be required to take note of the decisions rendered by this Court in Manish Singh v. GNCTD2 and
1 (2016) 8 SCC 471 2 315 (2024) DLT 707 Digitally Signed By:AJIT KUMAR Signing Date:24.07.2026 14:25:41 Signature Not Verified
W.P.(C) 9736/2026
Sandeep K L v. Union of India3
3. We direct the petitioners to take a de novo decision within a period of eight weeks from today.
4. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
VINOD KUMAR, J.
JULY 20, 2026
dsn
3 2025 SCC OnLine Del 6065 Digitally Signed By:AJIT KUMAR Signing Date:24.07.2026 14:25:41