Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13128 (KAR)

SRI RAVI KIRAN v. MS TEJASWINI M S

WP/3077/2026 · 2026-02-12

Chillakur Sumalatha

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8529 WP No. 3077 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA WRIT PETITION NO. 3077 OF 2026 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: SRI. RAVI KIRAN, S/O SRI MALLIKARJUN K. M., AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, RESIDING AT: MARULLASIDDESHWARA KRUPA, BAPUJI NAGAR 2ND MAIN, 1ST CROSS, NH 13-CHITRADURGA. ALSO AT: 3RD FLOOR, 5TH CROSS, MARUTHINAGAR, NEAR SHANTHI NIKETAN SCHOOL, BHADRAPPA LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560094 …PETITIONER (BY MISS ROOPA B. DEVARAJ, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SANTOSH S. GOGI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MS TEJASWINI M S D/O SRI. SHIVALINGAPPA N., AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, RESIDING AT M. K HATTI POST, MALLAPPANAHATTI, CHITRADURGA ALSO AT: RAJIV GANDHI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, RGC CAMPUS, PO, CHOLA NAGAR, Digitally signed by AASEEFA PARVEEN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8529 WP No. 3077 of 2026 CHOLANAYAKANAHALLI, RT NAGAR, BENGALURU-560032. 2. SRI. KANAKA RAJ SON OF SRI. SHANTHA RAJ, OPPOSITE TO GOVERNMENT PRIMARY SCHOOL, LAKSHMI SAGARA, SIRA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572139 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BASAVARAJ S. SAPPANNAVAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE HON'BLE TRIAL COURT DATED 06.01.2026 AND 14.01.2026 (ANNEXURE -H) PASSED BY THE HONBLE PRINCIPAL ADDITIONAL FAMILY JUDGE, BENGALURU ON I.A. NO. 2 FILED UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 1 AND 2 READ WITH 151 OF C.P.C IN O.S. NO. 10/2026, ON THE FILE HONBLE PRINCIPAL ADDITIONAL FAMILY JUDGE, BENGALURU. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8529 WP No. 3077 of 2026 ORAL ORDER Ms.Roopa B Devaraj representing Sri.Santosh S Gogi learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infurctuous. Seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Memo to that effect is also filed. Permission as prayed for is accorded. The writ petition is thereby dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE DS CT:TSM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8