1 / 4 2026:CGHC:21043 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 12283 of 2025 Kritesh Kumar S/o Uttam Kumar Aged About 43 Years R/o L F-30, Padum Nagar Bhilai-3, District - Durg Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Agriculture Development And Biotechnology Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Chhattisgarh State Seeds And Agriculture Development Corporation Limited Through General Manager Seed Bhawan, Telibandha Post Ravigram, G.E. Road Raipur, District – Raipur 3 - Managing Director Of Chhattisgarh State Seeds And Agriculture Development Corporation Limited, Seed Bhawan Telibandha Post Ravigram, G.E. Road Raipur, District Raipur 4 - Deputy Manager Of Chhattisgarh State Seeds And Agriculture Development Corporation Limited, Seed Bhawan Telibandha Post Ravigram, G.E. Road Raipur, District Raipur ... Respondent(s) Digitally signed by PRAVEEN KUMAR SINHA Date: 2026.05.06 18:47:13 +0530 2 / 4 For Petitioner : Mr. S.C. Verma, Senior Advocate (through VC) with Mr. Mohd. Naqeeb, Advocate For Resp. No.1/State: Ms. Anuja Sharma, Dy. Govt. Advocate For Resp. No.2 to 4 : Mr. Trivikram Nayak, Advocate S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 05/05/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs: “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may be kind enough in issuing a writ in the nature of mandamus, certiorari or likewise any other appropriate writ, commanding and directing the respondents to place the complete record related with the case of the petitioner for just and proper decision of the case. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may be kind enough in issuing a writ in the nature of mandamus, certiorari or likewise any other appropriate writ, commanding and directing to quash and set aside the impugned order of termination dated 25/09/2025 passed by the respondent No. 2. 10.3 That, this Hon'ble Court may be kind enough in issuing a writ in the nature of mandamus, certiorari or likewise any other appropriate writ, commanding and directing the respondent to reinstate the petitioner in service to the post of Production Assistant (Seed Division) with all consequential benefits, including continuity of service, back wages, and seniority. 10.4 Any other relief, which the Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be granted. 3 / 4 2. When this writ petition came up for hearing on 04.11.2025, Court has observed that petitioner is having remedy of filing appeal before the appellate authority. Relevant portion of order dated 04.11.2025 is reproduced as under: “The petitioner has remedy of filing an appeal before the Appellate Authority as framed for the Employees/Officers of Chhattisgarh State Seeds and Agriculture Development Corporation Limited under the Service Recruitment, Service Conditions, Classification, Service Conduct, Discipline, Control and Appeal Rules, 2011 (in short "Rules of 2011") therefore, at this juncture the matter may be kept in abeyance and may be taken up after two months. It is directed that the petitioner is at liberty to prefer an appeal before the Appellate Authority within 07 days from today itself and in turn the appellate authority are directed to consider and decide the same within stipulated time given under Rules of 2011.” 3. From the aforementioned order it is reflecting that petitioner was granted liberty to prefer an appeal before the appellate authority and the appellate authority was directed to consider and decide the appeal within stipulated time given under the Service Recruitment, Service Conditions, Classification, Service Conduct, Discipline, Control and Appeal Rules, 2011 . When case was again listed on 09.03.2026, it is brought to notice of this Court by counsel for respondent that, appeal preferred by petitioner herein was dismissed vide order dated 06.03.2006 and copy of order was placed in record along with application for taking document on record. Accordingly, thereafter petitioner has filed another writ petition bearing WPS No.2543 of 2026 4 / 4 challenging the order passed by appellate authority and has also sought quashing of order dated 25.09.2025 (order of termination) subject matter of present writ petition. 4. In the aforementioned facts of case when petitioner has already preferred fresh writ petition challenging the order passed by the appellate authority as also order of termination, in the opinion of this Court, no purpose will be served in keeping this writ petition pending. 5. Accordingly this writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Praveen