Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21314 of 2026 Court No. - 49 HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J.
HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J. Shri Shailendra Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner made a representation before the District Magistrate for release of the property seized under the U.P. Gangsters Act. Learned AGA on the basis of instructions submits that the representation of the petitioner has been decided by the competent authority under the U.P. Gangsters Act. The cause on which the writ petition was founded does not survive. The writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. October 7, 2026 Vandit Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shailendra Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Divesh Chandra Samant,J.) (Ajay Bhanot,J.) Anupam Dubey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VANDIT AGRAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad