Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:30180] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No. 11479/2026 CNR: RJHC020685022026 | URN: CRLMB / 21179U / 2026 Dharmendra S/o Revadram, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Amavara, Police Station Bamanwas, District Sawai Madhopur ( At Present Confined In Sub Jail Lalsot) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravindra Kumar Paliwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 04/08/2026
1. This second bail application has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No. 177/2025 registered at Police Station Mandavari, District Dausa for offence under Sections 8 and 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act 1985.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the samples of the alleged contraband said to have been recovered from the possession of the accused-petitioner were sent to the State Forensic Science Laboratory, Jaipur for its report regarding presence of the MDMA. The State Forensic Science Laboratory, Jaipur vide its report dated 29.04.2026 (Anenxure-3) has concluded that MDMA could not be detected in the sample packed in the packet marked R-2.
[2026:RJ-JP:30180] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11479/2026]
Learned counsel further submits that the accused- petitioner is in custody since 20.12.2025. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the second bail application and submits that because there were two different opinions of the Mobile Forensic Unit Dausa and the State Forensic Science Laboratory, Jaipur as regards the presence of MDMA in the collected samples of the alleged contraband, the samples have been sent for CFSL for examination. 4. Considered the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material available on record. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the samples have been sent for the CFSL for a report in view of the different opinions of the Mobile Forensic Unit Dausa and the State Forensic Science Laboratory, Jaipur, the Court on 23.07.2026 directed the CFSL to give report of the alleged contraband involved in this case at earliest within a period of ten days. In compliance of the order dated 23.07.2026, the information was sent to the CFSL as regards the order passed by this Court and the CFSL vide letter dated 24.07.2026 has reported that the case pertaining to the FIR No. 177/2025; PS- Mandawari, District Dausa, has not received in Narcotics division of CFSL, Chandigarh. Learned Public Prosecutor placed before this Court the photocopy of the letter dated 24.07.2026, which is taken on record. 6. Today the report of the State Forensic Science Laboratory, Jaipur is there on record which speaks of the fact that
[2026:RJ-JP:30180] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11479/2026] there is no MDMA in the samples collected regarding alleged contraband, which is said to have been recovered from the possession of the accused-petitioner. 7. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case as noted above, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioner on bail. 8.
Accordingly, the second bail application is allowed and it is directed that the accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lax Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 5/SHRUTI SHARMA