04.02.2026 Court No.28 Item No.22 tbsr Reject CRM (A) 4364 of 2025 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Baishnabnagar P.S. Case No.1301 of 2025 dated 03.10.2025 under Sections 21(c)/27A/29 of the NDPS Act, 1985. And In the matter of: Md Habibur Rahaman @ Habibur Rahaman ….Petitioner. Md. Wasim Akram ….for the petitioner Ms. Sreyashee Biswas Ms. Debolina Das ….for the State Report filed on behalf of the State is taken on record. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that there is no other material available in the case diary except for the statement of a co-accused. The petitioner is a CSP operator. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State relies on the report and the case diary and opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. She submits that other than the statements of the co-accused, there are money trail and phone call conversations between the petitioner and the principal accused present in the case diary. Considering the above and the other incriminating materials available in the case diary and the restriction contained in Section 37 of the NDPS Act, I do not consider this to be a fit case for granting anticipatory bail. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, rejected. 2 Urgent photostat certified copies of this order may be delivered to the learned Advocates for the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all formalities. (Jay Sengupta, J.)