Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13110 (JHR)

GEETA DEVI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./2530/2026 · 2026-05-14

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:14911 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2530 of 2026 ------ 1. Geeta Devi, aged about 30 years, wife of Shahdev Turi, resident of Gram Khawasdih Panchayat, P.O. Nandudih, P.S. Satgawan, District Koderma 2. Kiran Devi, aged about 29 years, wife of Santosh Kumar Turiya, resident of Gram Khawasdih Panchayat, P.O. Nandudih, P.S. Satgawan, District Koderma .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners : Mr. Mohammad Asghar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Bishambhar Shastri, A.P.P. ------ 02/14.05.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Satgawan P.S. Case No. 99 of 2024, registered for the offence under Sections 324(2), 115, 303(2), 351(2), 109(1), 118(1) and 3(5) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Koderma. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that earlier one of the accused in the above mentioned case namely Vimali Devi has lodged Satgawan P.S. Case No. 98 of 2024 and thereafter, the present case has been filed by the informant against the petitioners and others and all family members have been implicated. He next submits that these two petitioners are lady members of the family and there are general and omnibus allegations against all the accused persons of assault. He also submits that the petitioners are having no criminal antecedent as disclosed in para 16 of the petition. He further submits that two of the co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail in A.BA. No.665 of 2026. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the allegations of assault are there and the injury is said to be grievous. 5. Looking to the contents of the FIR, it transpires that there are general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners and further it is not clear that from whose blow the injury has been received and there are case 2026:JHHC:14911 and counter case between the parties and the petitioners are having no criminal antecedent as disclosed in para 16 of the petition, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the above-named petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender, they shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Koderma, in connection with Satgawan P.S. Case No. 99 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Anit Uploaded 16.05.2026